NewAssignment.Net

User login

Join NewAssignment.Net’s Facebook Group.

WHERE WE ARE

BeatBlogging.Org

13 beat reporters build social networks into their beats.

OffTheBus.Net

Help us cover the presidential elections at OffTheBus.net

Broowaha.com

A citizen journalism network to experiment with distributed reporting.

Readable Laws

Explaining Congressional legislation in plain English.

Assignment Zero

Published in Wired News.


Want To Learn More About NAN?

Check out this 7-minute interview with Jay Rosen. Or watch the full presentation at the Berkman Center, also available in MP3, or this five part nicely edited
series
.


Browse archives

« December 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Open Source Moves Deeper into Product Development

by Nichole Altmix on December 11, 2006 - 10:33pm.

Business resources just became easier to find. “What citizen journalism and YouTube have done for media, CrowdSpirit hopes to do for product development,” according to this post on Springwise, a blog on future business ideas.

As the name suggests, CrowdSpirit is part of the crowdsourcing phenomenon, but it takes it into a new wave, where the ‘group think’ method is used to refine real world hardware products. Crowdspirt “aims to start a revolution in manufacturing by creating the first electronic products driven and inspired by customer’s wishes and expectations.”

This site encourages inventors to submit electronic product designs to the online CrowdSpirit community, who in open source fashion, refine the original products and vote on which ones should move forward. After being reviewed and financed by “community investors,” CrowdSpirit helps the product reach market and offers it to buyers, presumably the same people who helped define it in the first place.

This project, while promising, is still in the works. It is somewhat hazy how customer-manufacturers will get rewarded for their designs and efforts. At the moment contributors give up all intellectual property rights when they submit an idea or product, or when they help define a product. Although it may be a nice launching pad for young inventors, unless they have a line-up of products, they take their cut and surrender their innovative idea to the company.

“Whilst the inventor is clearly a significant individual in a project, it is the entire supply chain which works together and brings the product to market and we would look at the entire supply chain for a product (including the inventor) to see how the major contributors could be rewarded in terms of recognition,” said Craig Cockburn of CrowdSpirit.

CrowdSpirit is one of many projects harnessing the crowd and an open source model to produce real world products. The most successful to date is probably Threadless.com, a t-shirt design company that lets young artists “easily get their work out there for their peers to critique.” T-shirt designs are posted, voted on and receive feedback from the community – and every week a few winners get sent to print. The model, which gives both designer and Threadless get a cut of the action, has received plenty of attention, and rightfully so.

Open-source has now branched from software to journalism and now to product development. It is not simply a trend; it’s spreading out, seeping into any industry that has the imagination to incorporate it. I am waiting for the open-source job application.

Nichole Altmix works in the IT Department of a law firm as an applications trainer. She freelances for Block Magazine in Brooklyn and a Midwest publication, Marion Living.


pr3

Designing/Building a compensation system.

I ran into this same problem (middle man wanting rights and control) with my Creative Commons licensed movie project, and have begun designing/building a compensation system with Sam Rose of Social Synergy Web. The idea is for this to be an open source software package which will allow contributors to trade their work for “project points.” Project Points will entitle them to a percentage of profits, when profits are made. This will allow creators/inventors to build their product without surrendering rights to a middle man, and contributors to get a share of the profits rather than working on a “work-for-hire” basis.

You can read our discussion about the project here:

Link


IP and financial reward clarification

Hello All,

I’d like to clarify a topic to avoid misunderstanding here : inventor will not lose all rights regarding their Intellectual Properties FOR FREE. We’re not crazy of course ;-). A financial proposal will be made based on the level of advancement of the idea. So an inventor will get a more important chance of revenue if his idea is closed to be manufactured versus a concept without any study. All the reward process will be clearly announced before our offical launch scheduled for 2nd quarter of 2007. So be patient and you will be able to judge.

Hope it helps

best regards

Lionel, CrowdSpirit Team


threadless

Threadless has proven to be a successful company because it is based on a simple concept (tshirts) and rewards its submitters with a comparable amount. While CrowdSpirits idea towards inventors/inventions could be a good idea, it’s hazy reward system is what I think is its downfall. Losing all rights to inventions is a bigger deal than tshirt submissions. While many inventors strive to have themselves discovered, giving up all their rights to the intellectual properties that they have been working on for YEARS (more than likely) is just absurd. It would be much wiser if Crowdspirit changes their policies to promote the inventor as well as take a slice of the pie. This could bring in more submissions while strengthening their credibility to the community and not some get rich scheme.


Re: Anonymous

I think you are right to point out this difference between Threadless and Crowdspirit. I think Crowdspirit is a great idea — finding a way to bring open source to the invention and production of hardware — I’m not completely sold on their system of rewards. But this is a complicated field to develop. I think something like this will eventually proliferate.