NewAssignment.Net

Join NewAssignment.Net’s Facebook Group.

WHERE WE ARE

BeatBlogging.Org

13 beat reporters build social networks into their beats.

OffTheBus.Net

Help us cover the presidential elections at OffTheBus.net

Broowaha.com

A citizen journalism network to experiment with distributed reporting.

Readable Laws

Explaining Congressional legislation in plain English.

Assignment Zero

Published in Wired News.


Want To Learn More About NAN?

Check out this 7-minute interview with Jay Rosen. Or watch the full presentation at the Berkman Center, also available in MP3, or this five part nicely edited
series
.


Browse archives

« July 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Harnessing Collective Intelligence: The Emergence of Web 3.0?

by David Cohn on November 12, 2006 - 5:04pm.

The Web is evolving at a rapid pace. In 2001 there was the crash and only a few years later Web 2.0 rose to become the dominant meme pushing the Internet into new frontiers.

During a Web 2.0 Summit talk, Tim O’Reilly talked about one of the emerging areas he calls “harnessing the collective intelligence.” This is a “far broader” understanding of user generated content, said O’Reilly. It is the basis of what many are calling the semantic Web and although the direct link wasn’t made, I suspect O’Reilly’s talk was inspiration for the New York Times to throw the term Web 3.0 out in a piece this Saturday.

In O’Reilly’s post Craig Kaplan said:

“Web 2.0 is just the froth before the wave. I believe networks of super intelligent cognitive communities are our future.”

Perhaps it is a bit early to start throwing around “Web 3.0” — many people are still grappling with 2.0 — but certainly finding a way to harness user generated content, as opposed to letting it run wild, is a step in a new direction. Like most things the 3.0 turn will happen without anyone taking notice and the watershed moment will only be decided after the wave crashes.


Marketing-speak

Web 3.0 seems like meaningless marketing-speak to me. Sure, collective knowledge works on the web — but that’s not news, and I was stumped at why the Times thought it belonged on Page 1.


Marketing-speak

Lisa
I agree — the 3.0 reference seems somewhat forced and I’m not sure what compelled the Times to do it — probably to sell papers. But O’Reilly’s talk on “harnessing the collective intelligence” is interesting — and obviously related to NewAssignment.Net. I see this “extra layer” of meaning as something built on top of Web 2.0 — not a shift towards a “Web 3.0” (whatever that means). A lot of people feel the same as you — Web 3.0 is just market jargon.