NewAssignment.Net blogs an experiment in open-source reporting http://www.newassignment.net/blog/atom/feed 2008-09-19T07:14:11-04:00 AOL Patch in Cleveland: Elephants, Mercenaries, and Crossing the Alps http://www.newassignment.net/blog/k_paul_mallasch/dec2010/28/aol_patch_in_cle 2010-12-28T03:38:15-05:00 2010-12-29T19:37:35-05:00 K. Paul Mallasch Buy the People and Force the People or By the People and for the People?
Here we are at the end of another year. For me, 2010 passed by like a closed rest step on the side of the highway when you really need a place to pull over and stretch your legs and contemplate the next part of your journey. There is good news, though, fellow journalists.
The front lines (and the guerrilla war behind enemy lines) are both going well as people begin to wrestle power from the corporate Overlords…..Wait. It’s the end of 2010. That stage is over. Good things are about to happen, however, as Cleveland Free Press starts up.

Crossing AlpsCrossing AlpsWebsites as War Elephants
I’m done with playing angry young journalist, and I’ve been quietly working on solutions. The focus has been money for just over a year and the results have been pretty good. From toys to military photos to televisions to robots, it’s all about niche content.
Newspapers and other big media companies should be putting these out a lot more. Hire more writers. Hire more photographers. And so on. While the History of Televisions or Toys Timeline websites aren’t ground-breaking journalism by any means, they do make profit with little investment.
There are some of us starting to plan the stages of hiring mercenaries - barbarians or merely content creators the “real” journalists call them. Although if you look at what AOL Patch is doing - they’re hiring (you can’t really call it that at the rates they pay) citizens to produce the “news.”
Quick story. I was dealing with the “press room” at Mitsubishi the other day about why they don’t think online journalists are worthy of their valuable information. I never got a real name from them. Just some sort of “desk” that I was emailing back and forth with. In the back of my mind, I could picture their laughter and mocking tone.
Instead of angry young journalist anger, I simply said, “Cool, the public will be okay without your information, I’m sure.”
I still don’t know what the problem was. I gave examples of “real” journalism. Just because I no longer dabble in print (at the moment), I’m no longer a genuine journalist? Who among you has taken a test or passed some sort of necessary certification? J-school?
Anyway, the point is that the future of media is looking bright. Even with AOL Patch trying to invade the Cleveland, Ohio area. In fact, that makes the next stage of my journey a little more exciting and important in a few ways.
As I head to Northern Ohio, I have already begun to gather allies that want to help save journalism - for the people. As the United States heads toward 2011, I am more excited than ever before about the prospects for grassroots journalism - for a better media in this country.
Grassroots JournalismGrassroots JournalismGrassroots Journalism in 2011
Throughout history, the best journalists have come from many different fields, bringing many different viewpoints and opinions to big J journalism. There I go again - big speeches with still very little to show. However, if you must know, I am perhaps keeping silent on purpose. I like to give updates here and there - notes for the book scattered on the web - but I’ve been quiet about the successes. And now here we are…
The year of Our Lord 2011 is almost here and things are continuing to improve. As I mentioned, the niche sites are taking off. This is with no overhead, no daily staff (yet), but raw determination and a ragtag band of new media rebels out there working the grind - ALL THE TIME. From toys to televisions to health to robots, I have spent time building up content online.
The equation for success? The Internet + Hard Work / Over Time = $ and of course the profit does not come easy or simple, but there is a very obvious model once you look. The thing I don’t understand is the waste at the large corporations. If I had a fraction of their resources, I can’t imagine what I would be able to do. Okay, maybe I do - perhaps even storming the gates of Rome herself to topple once and for all the old guard aka Big Media?
(Is Gannett Rome? Or is it the whole current system of media ownership?)
Don’t get me wrong. Journalism is still going to be important, but hopefully all the really talented journalists WILL BE WORKING FOR THEMSELVES. Massive amount of mini-collectives - working together. All it takes is one man to step forward and begin to put the pieces in place. The lean years of learning are just about over.
The plan of attack, the route over the Alps has been committed to memory and destroyed lest too much information is leaked to those in the Glass Towers reading spreadsheets and drinking coffee.
That’s not to say there aren’t great newspapers and media outlets still out there - big ones even - but the nation - the United States of America, I must sadly say, is chock full of mediocre, half-ass newspapers running on auto-pilot. The small and medium-sized print dailies are cash cows used to perpetuate the madness of the modern media machine. And don’t get me started on lame attempts like AOL Patch and why they are NOT shining beacons that are going to save journalism.
Some of the elephants (websites) I have with me may be lost trudging over the Alps, but the element of surprise is crucial to be able to effectively begin to dismantle the broken media outlets in this country. Perhaps not every journalist and person with a mission (or a passion) will work for themselves in the years to come, but many more are going to and they are going to need (or want) information from someone who has been in the trenches doing it for over half a decade.
I’m tired. Really. Exhausted. I work too much. My Oma worries about me, but I trudge forward, against the cold winds, knowing that crossing the Alps may be the only way.
The lessons learned in the medium sized markets in the Midwest will be very helpful moving into larger cities. The momentum is building. The networks are coming together and merging.
The clouds are forming, the storm is gathering, the people are typing and the words will always be there in one form or another.
Saving JournalismSaving JournalismAOL Patch in Cleveland? Hannibal on the Move?
If you haven’t heard by now, AOL Patch is trying to move into the Cleveland area in a big way. They have already started. To me, this is not good news or bad news really. It means there’s never been a better time maybe to return to my city, bringing the knowledge I’ve gained over the years.
AOL Patch - in my opinion - is BUY THE PEOPLE, FORCE THE PEOPLE rather than By the People and for the People. The two are close, of course, but the former is not going to be good for the people of the greater Cleveland area.
Cleveland.com (Plain Dealer, Sun News and others), AOL Patch, the Lakewood Observer and many, many others are in Cleveland now, some even doing really great things - the Lakewood Observer and the The Chubby Cook for example. In my mind, however, there’s never been a better time to join the fray and stake out my claim - for the people of the greater Cleveland, Ohio area.
While Anderson Free Press is still not where she should be at this time, I have decided to set my sights on a larger city to see if I can take the successful model I have in Indiana and transplant it to Cleveland, Ohio via Cleveland Free Press.
Is it a wise move? Wouldn’t Indianapolis, Indiana make more sense? After setting up Cleveland Free Press the weekend of 12/3/2010 and promoting it for a few weeks, the results are very positive. I have come into contact with friends old and new who are willing and able to help with Cleveland Free Press.
How does this differ from AOL Patch? For one, it’s bottom-up instead of top-down. The big media companies ARE the problem. There’s a solution that I’ll share in the years ahead, but for now know that big media ownership is why AOL Patch in Cleveland, Ohio and many other areas is going to fail - in a big way. (Akron anybody? McLean, VA? EveryBlock/MSNBC?)
Of course, some of the smaller players (like me) have failed in big and small ways over the last four or five years, but lessons are being learned. I still don’t claim to have all the answers, but I’ve learned that it is possible to create something online - a living, breathing community. And, maybe more importantly, multiple and sustainable revenue streams.
Once I can prove that my “model” for grassroots journalism can be transplanted from one location (two small cities in Indiana) to another (one large city in Ohio), things are really going to start moving more quickly.
So far, results have been very, very positive - even from a remote location. This will be a cash strapped attempt at starting something up in a large city, but I ask everyone out there to consider the resources AOL has when comparing their efforts with mine in 2011. By Q3 or Q4 2011, things should be really interesting.
For now, take a look at Cleveland Free Press - if you have friends, family, or even enemies in Northern Ohio, please pass on word about the site.
I’m going to try to contribute more to NewAssignment.net in 2011.
Remember, the future is online and non-linear.
Until next time,
keep up the good fight,
K. Paul Mallasch - Publisher
http://www.kpaulmedia.com


]]> Buy the People and Force the People or By the People and for the People?

Here we are at the end of another year. For me, 2010 passed by like a closed rest step on the side of the highway when you really need a place to pull over and stretch your legs and contemplate the next part of your journey. There is good news, though, fellow journalists.

The front lines (and the guerrilla war behind enemy lines) are both going well as people begin to wrestle power from the corporate Overlords…..Wait. It’s the end of 2010. That stage is over. Good things are about to happen, however, as Cleveland Free Press starts up.

Crossing AlpsCrossing AlpsWebsites as War Elephants

I’m done with playing angry young journalist, and I’ve been quietly working on solutions. The focus has been money for just over a year and the results have been pretty good. From toys to military photos to televisions to robots, it’s all about niche content.

Newspapers and other big media companies should be putting these out a lot more. Hire more writers. Hire more photographers. And so on. While the History of Televisions or Toys Timeline websites aren’t ground-breaking journalism by any means, they do make profit with little investment.

There are some of us starting to plan the stages of hiring mercenaries - barbarians or merely content creators the “real” journalists call them. Although if you look at what AOL Patch is doing - they’re hiring (you can’t really call it that at the rates they pay) citizens to produce the “news.”

Quick story. I was dealing with the “press room” at Mitsubishi the other day about why they don’t think online journalists are worthy of their valuable information. I never got a real name from them. Just some sort of “desk” that I was emailing back and forth with. In the back of my mind, I could picture their laughter and mocking tone.

Instead of angry young journalist anger, I simply said, “Cool, the public will be okay without your information, I’m sure.”

I still don’t know what the problem was. I gave examples of “real” journalism. Just because I no longer dabble in print (at the moment), I’m no longer a genuine journalist? Who among you has taken a test or passed some sort of necessary certification? J-school?

Anyway, the point is that the future of media is looking bright. Even with AOL Patch trying to invade the Cleveland, Ohio area. In fact, that makes the next stage of my journey a little more exciting and important in a few ways.

As I head to Northern Ohio, I have already begun to gather allies that want to help save journalism - for the people. As the United States heads toward 2011, I am more excited than ever before about the prospects for grassroots journalism - for a better media in this country.

Grassroots JournalismGrassroots JournalismGrassroots Journalism in 2011

Throughout history, the best journalists have come from many different fields, bringing many different viewpoints and opinions to big J journalism. There I go again - big speeches with still very little to show. However, if you must know, I am perhaps keeping silent on purpose. I like to give updates here and there - notes for the book scattered on the web - but I’ve been quiet about the successes. And now here we are…

The year of Our Lord 2011 is almost here and things are continuing to improve. As I mentioned, the niche sites are taking off. This is with no overhead, no daily staff (yet), but raw determination and a ragtag band of new media rebels out there working the grind - ALL THE TIME. From toys to televisions to health to robots, I have spent time building up content online.

The equation for success? The Internet + Hard Work / Over Time = $ and of course the profit does not come easy or simple, but there is a very obvious model once you look. The thing I don’t understand is the waste at the large corporations. If I had a fraction of their resources, I can’t imagine what I would be able to do. Okay, maybe I do - perhaps even storming the gates of Rome herself to topple once and for all the old guard aka Big Media?

(Is Gannett Rome? Or is it the whole current system of media ownership?)

Don’t get me wrong. Journalism is still going to be important, but hopefully all the really talented journalists WILL BE WORKING FOR THEMSELVES. Massive amount of mini-collectives - working together. All it takes is one man to step forward and begin to put the pieces in place. The lean years of learning are just about over.

The plan of attack, the route over the Alps has been committed to memory and destroyed lest too much information is leaked to those in the Glass Towers reading spreadsheets and drinking coffee.

That’s not to say there aren’t great newspapers and media outlets still out there - big ones even - but the nation - the United States of America, I must sadly say, is chock full of mediocre, half-ass newspapers running on auto-pilot. The small and medium-sized print dailies are cash cows used to perpetuate the madness of the modern media machine. And don’t get me started on lame attempts like AOL Patch and why they are NOT shining beacons that are going to save journalism.

Some of the elephants (websites) I have with me may be lost trudging over the Alps, but the element of surprise is crucial to be able to effectively begin to dismantle the broken media outlets in this country. Perhaps not every journalist and person with a mission (or a passion) will work for themselves in the years to come, but many more are going to and they are going to need (or want) information from someone who has been in the trenches doing it for over half a decade.

I’m tired. Really. Exhausted. I work too much. My Oma worries about me, but I trudge forward, against the cold winds, knowing that crossing the Alps may be the only way.

The lessons learned in the medium sized markets in the Midwest will be very helpful moving into larger cities. The momentum is building. The networks are coming together and merging.

The clouds are forming, the storm is gathering, the people are typing and the words will always be there in one form or another.

Saving JournalismSaving JournalismAOL Patch in Cleveland? Hannibal on the Move?

If you haven’t heard by now, AOL Patch is trying to move into the Cleveland area in a big way. They have already started. To me, this is not good news or bad news really. It means there’s never been a better time maybe to return to my city, bringing the knowledge I’ve gained over the years.

AOL Patch - in my opinion - is BUY THE PEOPLE, FORCE THE PEOPLE rather than By the People and for the People. The two are close, of course, but the former is not going to be good for the people of the greater Cleveland area.

Cleveland.com (Plain Dealer, Sun News and others), AOL Patch, the Lakewood Observer and many, many others are in Cleveland now, some even doing really great things - the Lakewood Observer and the The Chubby Cook for example. In my mind, however, there’s never been a better time to join the fray and stake out my claim - for the people of the greater Cleveland, Ohio area.

While Anderson Free Press is still not where she should be at this time, I have decided to set my sights on a larger city to see if I can take the successful model I have in Indiana and transplant it to Cleveland, Ohio via Cleveland Free Press.

Is it a wise move? Wouldn’t Indianapolis, Indiana make more sense? After setting up Cleveland Free Press the weekend of 12/3/2010 and promoting it for a few weeks, the results are very positive. I have come into contact with friends old and new who are willing and able to help with Cleveland Free Press.

How does this differ from AOL Patch? For one, it’s bottom-up instead of top-down. The big media companies ARE the problem. There’s a solution that I’ll share in the years ahead, but for now know that big media ownership is why AOL Patch in Cleveland, Ohio and many other areas is going to fail - in a big way. (Akron anybody? McLean, VA? EveryBlock/MSNBC?)

Of course, some of the smaller players (like me) have failed in big and small ways over the last four or five years, but lessons are being learned. I still don’t claim to have all the answers, but I’ve learned that it is possible to create something online - a living, breathing community. And, maybe more importantly, multiple and sustainable revenue streams.

Once I can prove that my “model” for grassroots journalism can be transplanted from one location (two small cities in Indiana) to another (one large city in Ohio), things are really going to start moving more quickly.

So far, results have been very, very positive - even from a remote location. This will be a cash strapped attempt at starting something up in a large city, but I ask everyone out there to consider the resources AOL has when comparing their efforts with mine in 2011. By Q3 or Q4 2011, things should be really interesting.

For now, take a look at Cleveland Free Press - if you have friends, family, or even enemies in Northern Ohio, please pass on word about the site.

I’m going to try to contribute more to NewAssignment.net in 2011.

Remember, the future is online and non-linear.

Until next time,
keep up the good fight,
K. Paul Mallasch - Publisher
http://www.kpaulmedia.com


]]> How the Social Media Converges with Mass Media What’s Missing from Today’s Hyperlocal Sites - Community Leadership http://www.newassignment.net/blog/pkitano/may2009/09/how_the_social_m 2009-05-09T14:10:22-04:00 2009-05-09T15:03:53-04:00 pkitano From Media Transparent.
What’s missing from sites focused on a city? Community organizers. It’s the same leadership dilemma facing any organization, whether physical or virtual. Hyperlocal sites need to be driven and organized by hubs and influencers of the local community, and these hubs need to feel invested and committed to their “city site”.


Hyperlocal “news” sites like Outside.In and Topix automatically pull feeds from local publishers to re-create a local newspaper. Although there are sporadic comments to articles, there is little community engagement. CitySearch and Yahoo! Local serve as online Yellow Pages.
Engaging hyperlocal sites need “word of mouth”
In many cities, the best hyperlocal sites are developed by somebody, some company or group in the community. In Santa Barbara, Edhat.com, developed by a local software company, has distinguished itself in providing compelling local content.
Hyperlocal social networks a la Ning generally don’t gain traction (show me one that does) because it takes too long for anybody to invest the time to set up a complete profile. Twitter makes hyperlocal communication easy because it can serve as a proxy social network for a local community that “follows” each other. There’s no login/profile setup requirement, just tweet.

Breaking News City sites that aggregate local Twitter feeds across various categories are being developed in cities across the country by individuals, and groups like chambers of commerces, who are hubs of their communities. They invest their time to create a useful hyperlocal community site by providing local Twitterers a venue to gain exposure in the community. There’s energy in facilitating the community conversation that “national” sites like Topix and CitySearch don’t have.
Example Breaking News City sites:
Asheville NC
Boston
Del Mar
London
Long Beach
Los Angeles
New York
Orange County
Sacramento
San Francisco
Toronto


]]> From Media Transparent.

What’s missing from sites focused on a city? Community organizers. It’s the same leadership dilemma facing any organization, whether physical or virtual. Hyperlocal sites need to be driven and organized by hubs and influencers of the local community, and these hubs need to feel invested and committed to their “city site”.


Hyperlocal “news” sites like Outside.In and Topix automatically pull feeds from local publishers to re-create a local newspaper. Although there are sporadic comments to articles, there is little community engagement. CitySearch and Yahoo! Local serve as online Yellow Pages.

Engaging hyperlocal sites need “word of mouth”

In many cities, the best hyperlocal sites are developed by somebody, some company or group in the community. In Santa Barbara, Edhat.com, developed by a local software company, has distinguished itself in providing compelling local content.

Hyperlocal social networks a la Ning generally don’t gain traction (show me one that does) because it takes too long for anybody to invest the time to set up a complete profile. Twitter makes hyperlocal communication easy because it can serve as a proxy social network for a local community that “follows” each other. There’s no login/profile setup requirement, just tweet.

Breaking News City sites that aggregate local Twitter feeds across various categories are being developed in cities across the country by individuals, and groups like chambers of commerces, who are hubs of their communities. They invest their time to create a useful hyperlocal community site by providing local Twitterers a venue to gain exposure in the community. There’s energy in facilitating the community conversation that “national” sites like Topix and CitySearch don’t have.

Example Breaking News City sites:

Asheville NC
Boston
Del Mar
London
Long Beach
Los Angeles
New York
Orange County
Sacramento
San Francisco
Toronto


]]> Syndicaster - Boon for Local Broadcast News? http://www.newassignment.net/blog/tom_cheredar/apr2009/17/syndicaster_boon 2009-04-17T05:52:49-04:00 2009-04-17T05:52:49-04:00 Tom Cheredar TechCrunch Co-Editor Erick Schonfeld wrote a great article about video hosting service Syndicaster’s increased options for distributing local broadcast news.

Via TechCrunch:

…Syndicaster is adding one-click distribution options to the major video sites so that local TV affiliates or station groups can post their videos to AOL Money & Finance or their YouTube channel, and manage it all from one place. One feature that TV customers will appreciate is the ability to set embargo windows for each service, allowing a TV station to publish hot news immediately to its own site, then 24 or 36 hours later to video partner sites where it makes the most money, and then maybe finally to YouTube.

While the article focuses on Syndicaster’s business model and its potential to rejuvenate local broadcast news organizations, it does make short mention of the startup’s inability to generate a profit from consumers. Until they can turn a profit on user generated content, they wouldn’t be including features for it. And beside it being costly and unpredictable to manage, I’m not convinced that any national (media) company needs to enable user generated news.
That job belongs to the local news organizations. And the only way they can be successful is if they provide the one thing that national entities cannot produce: A strong, valuable relationship with a local community.


]]> TechCrunch Co-Editor Erick Schonfeld wrote a great article about video hosting service Syndicaster’s increased options for distributing local broadcast news.

Via TechCrunch:

…Syndicaster is adding one-click distribution options to the major video sites so that local TV affiliates or station groups can post their videos to AOL Money & Finance or their YouTube channel, and manage it all from one place. One feature that TV customers will appreciate is the ability to set embargo windows for each service, allowing a TV station to publish hot news immediately to its own site, then 24 or 36 hours later to video partner sites where it makes the most money, and then maybe finally to YouTube.

While the article focuses on Syndicaster’s business model and its potential to rejuvenate local broadcast news organizations, it does make short mention of the startup’s inability to generate a profit from consumers. Until they can turn a profit on user generated content, they wouldn’t be including features for it. And beside it being costly and unpredictable to manage, I’m not convinced that any national (media) company needs to enable user generated news.

That job belongs to the local news organizations. And the only way they can be successful is if they provide the one thing that national entities cannot produce: A strong, valuable relationship with a local community.


]]> GroundReport and Worldfocus Join to Tell Stories http://www.newassignment.net/blog/rachelsterne/feb2009/05/groundreport_and 2009-02-05T21:25:58-05:00 2009-02-05T21:25:58-05:00 RachelSterne GroundReport just got a great opportunity through Talk To US: bring the voices and faces of global citizen journalists to national television program Worldfocus.
Every month we ask a question on news perspectives, and the most compelling video response is aired on TV for hundreds of thousands. It’s a big deal for us, but a bigger deal for citizen journalism— and a tall order. We need to find the best video from across the globe. This is why I would like to ask for your help.
Our first question is ‘What’s your advice for President Barack Obama?’
Please share this email with your networks of citizen journalists, activists, video producers and brilliant, engaged citizens. Or even better— post a video response yourself. This is an amazing way to bring attention to your cause, issue or mission. If you are part of a citizen journalism entity, we can feature your logo as well.
To respond, log in to http://GroundReport.com and upload your video of advice for Obama— all videos on GroundReport are automatically entered.
Or, if you’d prefer, visit the video page on YouTube, log in, and upload your video directly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlVSQ8zzHsE
The deadline is next week, so time is of the essence.


]]> GroundReport just got a great opportunity through Talk To US: bring the voices and faces of global citizen journalists to national television program Worldfocus.

Every month we ask a question on news perspectives, and the most compelling video response is aired on TV for hundreds of thousands. It’s a big deal for us, but a bigger deal for citizen journalism— and a tall order. We need to find the best video from across the globe. This is why I would like to ask for your help.

Our first question is ‘What’s your advice for President Barack Obama?’

Please share this email with your networks of citizen journalists, activists, video producers and brilliant, engaged citizens. Or even better— post a video response yourself. This is an amazing way to bring attention to your cause, issue or mission. If you are part of a citizen journalism entity, we can feature your logo as well.

To respond, log in to http://GroundReport.com and upload your video of advice for Obama— all videos on GroundReport are automatically entered.

Or, if you’d prefer, visit the video page on YouTube, log in, and upload your video directly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlVSQ8zzHsE

The deadline is next week, so time is of the essence.


]]> Anderson Free Press Update http://www.newassignment.net/blog/k_paul_mallasch/jan2009/29/anderson_free_pr 2009-01-29T22:58:33-05:00 2009-01-29T22:58:33-05:00 K. Paul Mallasch Dear World:
I’m coming up on four entire years out here on the front lines of the media revolution being waged across the nation, across the world. In that time, a lot of other similar sites (some with millions of dollars of cash injected into them) have fallen. A lot of other sites continue to thrive, though, all over.
Personally, my first site was Muncie Free Press. The launch was ok and I got the traffic up to around 20,000 visitors a month. A couple years after starting it, I also launched some other sites for nearby counties. One, Anderson Free Press, has, in less time, overtaken MFP - both in traffic and, more importantly, participation.
I’ve talked about AFP here before, I believe. Since then, though, I’ve made a lot more progress. It started last summer. I was able to put together (on my own, using photoshop and email) an 8-page tabloid prototype for the AFP website. I mailed to three zip codes - around 17,000 copies. I’ve never really been good at sales, so I hired someone (with a low, low salary and high commission) to sell ads for the next issue. Sales were … ok. I only had enough to pay him for 10 to 20 hours a week, which really isn’t enough.
The second issue came out, though. Then the third - mostly supported by the local political campaigns. The fourth issue I still lost money, but it was very, very close. With a little more effort - and a sales team or full time salesperson - I’m sure it can be done. The easy money dried up after the elections, so I stopped printing. The process taught me a lot, though. I took it all back to the drawing board. (The publisher of the Herald Bulletin called it a “rag,” but I’m not sure if he knew I know it was a term of endearment. Maybe. Heh.)
For one, I learned I’m not going to be able to do it all on my own. I need other people. So, I’m working with the local Small Business Administration to come up with a business plan to shop around for a local investor. That may never happen, but with even 1% of what some of the other community journalism start-ups have gotten, I’m sure I could get the ball rolling, in motion.
Even if I don’t get funding, there are other ways I’m looking at to get at least a quarterly or bi-monthly printed edition out. Even if they don’t pan out, though, the website is what it’s really about. In fact, a few have privately told me to forget about print and concentrate more on the website.
Doing the printed edition, though, I saw my traffic quadruple. Not only that, people started to sign-up and participate. By this time, the user started “Scanner News” thread had become one of the most popular features on the site. The local journalists at the CNHI owned The Herald Bulletin may look down their noses at it, declaring it “non-journalism,” but you know what? It’s information. It’s pure and raw and unedited mostly (at this time!), but it’s information.
Anderson Free Press has become known as the website to go to first to see what’s breaking, what’s happening. The Herald Bulletin lumbers along hours later usually to do the full story, but people know AFP is where to get it first - most of the time. There was a fire New Year’s Eve that came over the scanner. Within minutes, dispatchers, EMTs, and everyday citizens were contributing whatever information they had. Hours later, the next day, The Herald Bulletin rolled into action and covered the story “properly.” A couple weeks later (during the day), we hit our front pages with the news about the same time. AFP even had an amateur photographer go out and get shots of the fire, though.
An interesting thing that was pointed out by members of AFP is that since the Scanner News thread is so popular and so talked about, The Herald Bulletin has started running little mini-stories - “Just heard on the scanner…” types of things. They’re getting better at closing the gap and are more frequently beating AFP to the punch with at least an acknowledgment that something is happening. They are watching AFP and trying to adapt, but being a Stegasaurus, they’re too slow and they just don’t “get” online, imho.
For example, in December, they decided to close down their public forums. Yup, you heard that right. Their editor said it was an ethical responsibility, but the word on their forums and AFP was that it was either because they were afraid of being sued, or were too lazy to moderate their forums. Whatever the reason, I couldn’t believe my ears. After it happened, I emailed the HB publisher and thanked him, telling him that closing their forums was the best Christmas present I’d gotten that year. I told him my offer for a lunch meeting was still open. He replied with a simple Thanks. (You see now why I hit the ceiling early in my corporate career? Smile.) This was the third great wave of new users on the site.
Oh, I’ve matured a lot out here in the front lines of the struggle, but it’s still fun, still about more than just the money. If you have time, check out this video. In it, Anderson Mayor Kris Ockomon takes The Herald Bulletin to task for an editorial they wrote about his administration. Before AFP, he might not have had a voice to respond. Earlier in the video, I ask him about a local landfill battle going on. I received an email thanking me for asking the question other local media wasn’t asking because it was a county issue rather than a city issue. To me, these are wonderful things that make me want to keep going.
Hopefully hammering out (finally) a real business plan and getting a little more organized, I can really take this to the next level. I invite you, though, to stop by Anderson Free Press. Either to just look around at all the activity or better yet, sign-up and engage the community, asking them what they think about AFP.
Anderson Free Press still has a long way to go, but all the numbers continue to rise - little by little. I just wanted to send a little “note in a bottle” to the intrawebs (thanks, David) to let others know that it’s working, that the media landscape is changing in America. We still have a long way to go, but it’s happening. (The spot.us idea is really cool, btw ;)
If you’ve ever been so tired of your local media that you wanted to start your own, now’s the time. It’s a hard, long road, but as more and more of us early pioneers (some have been at it longer than me), as we learn how to make it work, the knowledge will filter down and a thousand or more grassroots journalism efforts will bloom across this nation. That’s when things will really start to get interesting.
As I mentioned, I’d love you to stop by Anderson Free Press and let me (and the local community if you want) know what you think about what we’re building here in the Midwest.
Ever the dreamer,
K. Paul Mallasch - Publisher
http://www.kpaulmedia.com


]]> Dear World:

I’m coming up on four entire years out here on the front lines of the media revolution being waged across the nation, across the world. In that time, a lot of other similar sites (some with millions of dollars of cash injected into them) have fallen. A lot of other sites continue to thrive, though, all over.

Personally, my first site was Muncie Free Press. The launch was ok and I got the traffic up to around 20,000 visitors a month. A couple years after starting it, I also launched some other sites for nearby counties. One, Anderson Free Press, has, in less time, overtaken MFP - both in traffic and, more importantly, participation.

I’ve talked about AFP here before, I believe. Since then, though, I’ve made a lot more progress. It started last summer. I was able to put together (on my own, using photoshop and email) an 8-page tabloid prototype for the AFP website. I mailed to three zip codes - around 17,000 copies. I’ve never really been good at sales, so I hired someone (with a low, low salary and high commission) to sell ads for the next issue. Sales were … ok. I only had enough to pay him for 10 to 20 hours a week, which really isn’t enough.

The second issue came out, though. Then the third - mostly supported by the local political campaigns. The fourth issue I still lost money, but it was very, very close. With a little more effort - and a sales team or full time salesperson - I’m sure it can be done. The easy money dried up after the elections, so I stopped printing. The process taught me a lot, though. I took it all back to the drawing board. (The publisher of the Herald Bulletin called it a “rag,” but I’m not sure if he knew I know it was a term of endearment. Maybe. Heh.)

For one, I learned I’m not going to be able to do it all on my own. I need other people. So, I’m working with the local Small Business Administration to come up with a business plan to shop around for a local investor. That may never happen, but with even 1% of what some of the other community journalism start-ups have gotten, I’m sure I could get the ball rolling, in motion.

Even if I don’t get funding, there are other ways I’m looking at to get at least a quarterly or bi-monthly printed edition out. Even if they don’t pan out, though, the website is what it’s really about. In fact, a few have privately told me to forget about print and concentrate more on the website.

Doing the printed edition, though, I saw my traffic quadruple. Not only that, people started to sign-up and participate. By this time, the user started “Scanner News” thread had become one of the most popular features on the site. The local journalists at the CNHI owned The Herald Bulletin may look down their noses at it, declaring it “non-journalism,” but you know what? It’s information. It’s pure and raw and unedited mostly (at this time!), but it’s information.

Anderson Free Press has become known as the website to go to first to see what’s breaking, what’s happening. The Herald Bulletin lumbers along hours later usually to do the full story, but people know AFP is where to get it first - most of the time. There was a fire New Year’s Eve that came over the scanner. Within minutes, dispatchers, EMTs, and everyday citizens were contributing whatever information they had. Hours later, the next day, The Herald Bulletin rolled into action and covered the story “properly.” A couple weeks later (during the day), we hit our front pages with the news about the same time. AFP even had an amateur photographer go out and get shots of the fire, though.

An interesting thing that was pointed out by members of AFP is that since the Scanner News thread is so popular and so talked about, The Herald Bulletin has started running little mini-stories - “Just heard on the scanner…” types of things. They’re getting better at closing the gap and are more frequently beating AFP to the punch with at least an acknowledgment that something is happening. They are watching AFP and trying to adapt, but being a Stegasaurus, they’re too slow and they just don’t “get” online, imho.

For example, in December, they decided to close down their public forums. Yup, you heard that right. Their editor said it was an ethical responsibility, but the word on their forums and AFP was that it was either because they were afraid of being sued, or were too lazy to moderate their forums. Whatever the reason, I couldn’t believe my ears. After it happened, I emailed the HB publisher and thanked him, telling him that closing their forums was the best Christmas present I’d gotten that year. I told him my offer for a lunch meeting was still open. He replied with a simple Thanks. (You see now why I hit the ceiling early in my corporate career? Smile.) This was the third great wave of new users on the site.

Oh, I’ve matured a lot out here in the front lines of the struggle, but it’s still fun, still about more than just the money. If you have time, check out this video. In it, Anderson Mayor Kris Ockomon takes The Herald Bulletin to task for an editorial they wrote about his administration. Before AFP, he might not have had a voice to respond. Earlier in the video, I ask him about a local landfill battle going on. I received an email thanking me for asking the question other local media wasn’t asking because it was a county issue rather than a city issue. To me, these are wonderful things that make me want to keep going.

Hopefully hammering out (finally) a real business plan and getting a little more organized, I can really take this to the next level. I invite you, though, to stop by Anderson Free Press. Either to just look around at all the activity or better yet, sign-up and engage the community, asking them what they think about AFP.

Anderson Free Press still has a long way to go, but all the numbers continue to rise - little by little. I just wanted to send a little “note in a bottle” to the intrawebs (thanks, David) to let others know that it’s working, that the media landscape is changing in America. We still have a long way to go, but it’s happening. (The spot.us idea is really cool, btw ;)

If you’ve ever been so tired of your local media that you wanted to start your own, now’s the time. It’s a hard, long road, but as more and more of us early pioneers (some have been at it longer than me), as we learn how to make it work, the knowledge will filter down and a thousand or more grassroots journalism efforts will bloom across this nation. That’s when things will really start to get interesting.

As I mentioned, I’d love you to stop by Anderson Free Press and let me (and the local community if you want) know what you think about what we’re building here in the Midwest.

Ever the dreamer,

K. Paul Mallasch - Publisher

http://www.kpaulmedia.com


]]> KnoxNews Makes Citizen Journalism Easier With New iPhone App http://www.newassignment.net/blog/tom_cheredar/dec2008/07/knoxnews_makes_c 2008-12-08T01:46:38-05:00 2008-12-08T02:04:07-05:00 Tom Cheredar Apple’s iPhone is so much of a game changer on the news reporting front that even local media organizations are rushing to accommodate support for both users and reporters.

Knoxville, Tennessee based KnoxNews released their own iPhone application last month allowing users to upload their own reports to a profile hosted via im.knoxnews.com. Each report can be accompanied by a photo and categorized by subject and search tags, which are also chosen by the user.
Please note: this is not a simple news reader for people to check the latest headlines wherever they are. This is an application that is best served as a tool for reporters — citizens and professionals alike.
Only two other applications offer functionality similar to the KnoxNews’ app: the CBS eyeMobile and FOX’s uReport. Of course the case can be made that the Facebook application also allows for instant updates of news, but its not directly affiliated with a news organization.
What’s interesting about the KnoxNews app is how the developers have managed to surpass the large broadcast stations in terms of functionality. Both applications from CBS and FOX are limiting to users wishing to conduct a report due to the components required for submission.
“The FOX application won’t even let you begin the report until you take a picture,” says Senior Software Engineer Ben Henderson of Firefly Logic, whose company was commissioned to do the KnoxNews app.
Henderson and Firefly Logic partner Chris McPherson explained to me in an interview that they wanted to allow the users to decide how to best use the features rather than forcing them into snapping a photo as is the case with the applications from the broadcast media companies.
“What we did was basically take KnoxNews’ content management [system] and extended the functionality to the iPhone,” McPherson says.
Cell Journalist, the company behind KnoxNews’ Content Management system, have commissioned a similar iPhone application for their other clients as well.


]]> Apple’s iPhone is so much of a game changer on the news reporting front that even local media organizations are rushing to accommodate support for both users and reporters.

Knoxville, Tennessee based KnoxNews released their own iPhone application last month allowing users to upload their own reports to a profile hosted via im.knoxnews.com. Each report can be accompanied by a photo and categorized by subject and search tags, which are also chosen by the user.

Please note: this is not a simple news reader for people to check the latest headlines wherever they are. This is an application that is best served as a tool for reporters — citizens and professionals alike.

Only two other applications offer functionality similar to the KnoxNews’ app: the CBS eyeMobile and FOX’s uReport. Of course the case can be made that the Facebook application also allows for instant updates of news, but its not directly affiliated with a news organization.

What’s interesting about the KnoxNews app is how the developers have managed to surpass the large broadcast stations in terms of functionality. Both applications from CBS and FOX are limiting to users wishing to conduct a report due to the components required for submission.

“The FOX application won’t even let you begin the report until you take a picture,” says Senior Software Engineer Ben Henderson of Firefly Logic, whose company was commissioned to do the KnoxNews app.

Henderson and Firefly Logic partner Chris McPherson explained to me in an interview that they wanted to allow the users to decide how to best use the features rather than forcing them into snapping a photo as is the case with the applications from the broadcast media companies.

“What we did was basically take KnoxNews’ content management [system] and extended the functionality to the iPhone,” McPherson says.

Cell Journalist, the company behind KnoxNews’ Content Management system, have commissioned a similar iPhone application for their other clients as well.


]]> Live Broadcasts: Prevent FCC Fines By Using Firefox w/ Greasemonkey http://www.newassignment.net/blog/tom_cheredar/nov2008/08/live_broadcasts_ 2008-11-08T06:25:55-05:00 2008-11-08T06:26:44-05:00 Tom Cheredar If you understood the title written above, skip down to the link, install the script and enjoy your FCC violation-free twitter feed that is safe to broadcast over live television. However, if the headline made no sense to you what-so-ever, then don’t worry. It’s still not that difficult. I can explain how to do it pretty quickly actually:

Rather than explain what each part is, I’ll just cut to the chase. First you should be using the Firefox browser (it won’t work unless you use Firefox). The next thing you need to do is download a Firefox add-on called “Greasemonkey,” [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748]. After that you need to download/install (meaning click a button) a greasemonkey script that adds two new fields under the menu sidebar. These are filters for you to Black-list and white-list certain words or users…all you do is type the word in, then hit enter and that word disappears from your feed temporarily.
Want to remove the filter? Just delete the text in the field and hit enter again or reload the page. It’s great for broadcasting a visual of the feed without the fear of cursewords popping up.
It’s seriously that simple. I just tried it out and it works flawlessly. Here’s the link to that particular greasemonkey script:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/36522
(Just remember to stay hypersensitive to all updates and version changes…like when Firefox has an update, just check to make sure the scripts from greasemonkey are still functional…small price to pay in my opinion)


]]> If you understood the title written above, skip down to the link, install the script and enjoy your FCC violation-free twitter feed that is safe to broadcast over live television. However, if the headline made no sense to you what-so-ever, then don’t worry. It’s still not that difficult. I can explain how to do it pretty quickly actually:

Rather than explain what each part is, I’ll just cut to the chase. First you should be using the Firefox browser (it won’t work unless you use Firefox). The next thing you need to do is download a Firefox add-on called “Greasemonkey,” [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748]. After that you need to download/install (meaning click a button) a greasemonkey script that adds two new fields under the menu sidebar. These are filters for you to Black-list and white-list certain words or users…all you do is type the word in, then hit enter and that word disappears from your feed temporarily.

Want to remove the filter? Just delete the text in the field and hit enter again or reload the page. It’s great for broadcasting a visual of the feed without the fear of cursewords popping up.

It’s seriously that simple. I just tried it out and it works flawlessly. Here’s the link to that particular greasemonkey script:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/36522

(Just remember to stay hypersensitive to all updates and version changes…like when Firefox has an update, just check to make sure the scripts from greasemonkey are still functional…small price to pay in my opinion)


]]> Better Journalism Requires More Applied Ideas, Not More People http://www.newassignment.net/blog/tom_cheredar/nov2008/08/better_journalis 2008-11-08T06:09:04-05:00 2008-11-08T06:09:04-05:00 Tom Cheredar Arguably the country’s most respected newspaper, the New York Times, along with non-profit site Propublica, have applied for a joint $1 mil grant for their “Document Cloud” entry in in the 2008 Knight News Challenge, according to a Nieman Journalism Lab article. For those not familiar with the aforementioned contest, it has three
core requirements, which you can read about on the official site.

My immediate reaction to the entry was of confusion. Why would a well-known media organization need to apply for a grant that funds good ideas? If you have resources, influence and reach then wouldn’t you already be paid to produce good ideas that would have a positive impact on journalism? NewAssignment.net founder/director Jay Rosen, who shared the article on his twitter feed wondered why the Times was asking for donating a million dollars instead of donating it.
Derek Willis, who works for the NYT, pointed out (via twitter ) that the company is well within the bounds of the contest rules, which do not prevent large organizations from applying. And while he and everyone involved in the Propublica/NYT entry are certainly among the forward thinkers of our profession, as a large company they risk altering the news challenge. I think it’s necessary to point out the differences of a large organization applying for the same grant money as a virtually unknown individual.
Money
So if the Times were to win funding, a fifth of the total dollars allotted would be given to a company who has yet to produce anything innovative enough to lead its industry. Instead it’s the technology companies that have paved the way for better tools. What I don’t understand about the NYT/Propublica entry is that if this was such a good idea, why didn’t the company get behind it in the first place? Also, why wouldn’t they push thru the idea because it will help reporting even if it wouldn’t make money? And if the technology is already built and about to be released as open source, what is the $1 mil in funding for? (I realize this would actually be fleshed out in the second round of the challenge).
To give some contrast to the situation, I asked for $75,000 in funding for my idea with the understanding that the open-source community would be essential in helping achieve the goal of my project. But even if I had requested a million to hire out an entire team of developers, I doubt it would be half as good. The community has to will it into existence along with the vision to improve something — (quality of journalism, life, the world). If I needed additional funding for my project, it’s going to be much more difficult to find it. However, the Times cannot necessarily say the same.
Influence
The chances that a good idea to improve local journalism will come from a single person is rare. But a good idea to improve local journalism from a large organization is really just about as likely. The key difference is that while the large organization has plenty of opportunities to get their own idea off the ground, a single individual can blog about it until their fingers fall off from typing too much and still not get nearly the same benefits as winning the KNC. Individuals NEED the news challenge funding and I’m not yet convinced the same is true for newspaper companies.
Reach
As individual I have laughable level of clout in comparison to the Times. This is somewhat obvious but, considering that I would have to approach several leaders of local media outlets with an idea to advance
journalism, it’s significant. If the Times approaches local media with an idea (any idea), they will almost certainly jump on board because they are the New York Times and it would be an honor to partner with a paper like that on anything at all. On the other hand, if I tried a similar measure without winning the KNC, I’d (probably) get laughed at and shown the door.
I’m not saying that the good folks working on the Document Cloud project for the Times are not capable of producing something that would actually help journalism move forward. It’s ridiculous to even consider that a posibility because (I assume) most of them are tech geeks in addition to being dedicated journalists (and vise versa) . Ultimately, I think they’d be more effective as individuals with lots of contacts through their day jobs than they are as a large organization because they’d get the best of both worlds. What we need out of this contest is more applied ideas, not necessarily more people involved in producing each idea.


]]> Arguably the country’s most respected newspaper, the New York Times, along with non-profit site Propublica, have applied for a joint $1 mil grant for their “Document Cloud” entry in in the 2008 Knight News Challenge, according to a Nieman Journalism Lab article. For those not familiar with the aforementioned contest, it has three
core requirements, which you can read about on the official site.

My immediate reaction to the entry was of confusion. Why would a well-known media organization need to apply for a grant that funds good ideas? If you have resources, influence and reach then wouldn’t you already be paid to produce good ideas that would have a positive impact on journalism? NewAssignment.net founder/director Jay Rosen, who shared the article on his twitter feed wondered why the Times was asking for donating a million dollars instead of donating it.

Derek Willis, who works for the NYT, pointed out (via twitter ) that the company is well within the bounds of the contest rules, which do not prevent large organizations from applying. And while he and everyone involved in the Propublica/NYT entry are certainly among the forward thinkers of our profession, as a large company they risk altering the news challenge. I think it’s necessary to point out the differences of a large organization applying for the same grant money as a virtually unknown individual.

Money
So if the Times were to win funding, a fifth of the total dollars allotted would be given to a company who has yet to produce anything innovative enough to lead its industry. Instead it’s the technology companies that have paved the way for better tools. What I don’t understand about the NYT/Propublica entry is that if this was such a good idea, why didn’t the company get behind it in the first place? Also, why wouldn’t they push thru the idea because it will help reporting even if it wouldn’t make money? And if the technology is already built and about to be released as open source, what is the $1 mil in funding for? (I realize this would actually be fleshed out in the second round of the challenge).

To give some contrast to the situation, I asked for $75,000 in funding for my idea with the understanding that the open-source community would be essential in helping achieve the goal of my project. But even if I had requested a million to hire out an entire team of developers, I doubt it would be half as good. The community has to will it into existence along with the vision to improve something — (quality of journalism, life, the world). If I needed additional funding for my project, it’s going to be much more difficult to find it. However, the Times cannot necessarily say the same.

Influence
The chances that a good idea to improve local journalism will come from a single person is rare. But a good idea to improve local journalism from a large organization is really just about as likely. The key difference is that while the large organization has plenty of opportunities to get their own idea off the ground, a single individual can blog about it until their fingers fall off from typing too much and still not get nearly the same benefits as winning the KNC. Individuals NEED the news challenge funding and I’m not yet convinced the same is true for newspaper companies.

Reach
As individual I have laughable level of clout in comparison to the Times. This is somewhat obvious but, considering that I would have to approach several leaders of local media outlets with an idea to advance
journalism, it’s significant. If the Times approaches local media with an idea (any idea), they will almost certainly jump on board because they are the New York Times and it would be an honor to partner with a paper like that on anything at all. On the other hand, if I tried a similar measure without winning the KNC, I’d (probably) get laughed at and shown the door.

I’m not saying that the good folks working on the Document Cloud project for the Times are not capable of producing something that would actually help journalism move forward. It’s ridiculous to even consider that a posibility because (I assume) most of them are tech geeks in addition to being dedicated journalists (and vise versa) . Ultimately, I think they’d be more effective as individuals with lots of contacts through their day jobs than they are as a large organization because they’d get the best of both worlds. What we need out of this contest is more applied ideas, not necessarily more people involved in producing each idea.


]]> A Note to OffTheBus Contributors http://www.newassignment.net/blog/david_cohn/nov2008/06/a_note_to_offthe 2008-11-06T16:36:36-05:00 2008-11-06T16:36:36-05:00 David Cohn Dear OffTheBus members,
Back in July 2007 I showed up at HuffPost’s Manhattan office with a suitcase packed with enough clothes to get me through the month while I looked for an apartment and started OffTheBus. Even before our official launch many of you were peppering my inbox with emails, wanting to know what you could do to help. Among that initial circle of my newfound friends and acquaintances were Mayhill Fowler — who later rocked the campaigns and campaign journalism with what we now know as “Bittergate”; Beverly Davis — a veteran reporter who provided invaluable insight into the role that citizen journalists could play on the trail; Richard Riehl — the editor of the much loved Roadkill, that tasty, daily collection of candidate gaffes; and Ethan Hova — a Shakespearean actor from Los Angeles who co-wrote our first big story, “Romney Buys Conservatives.”
Sixteen months later and our network has grown by the thousands. The staff also grew, as I was joined by Marc Cooper, Neil Nagraj, John Tomasic, and Hanna Ingber Win and intern Gabriel Beltrone. Mayhill, Beverly, Richard, and Ethan have been joined by a remarkable cast of home-makers, retired journalists, aspiring journalists, lawyers and doctors, actors and actresses, some curmudgeons and, yes, a few professional journalists. New friends are now old friends, and old friends are friends forever.
Together we have been credited with creating the genre of citizen journalism (New York Magazine). You have broken some of the election cycle’s biggest scoops. You have also been described - by none other than the New York Times - as a “force in journalism.”
We — Marc, John, Hanna, Neil, Gabriel, Amanda — couldn’t be more proud of what we have all achieved together.
For just this once we are not going to ask you to write or report anything. Celebrate! Break out that champagne, beer, or wine (or for those young enough or so inclined, a coffee or chocolate cake) and make a toast! Or two. Or three.
Journalism isn’t and never has been a monolithic craft. The profession has a rich and varied history that often gets lost in defensive justifications of the status quo. In this election cycle journalism as we know it evolved tremendously, and you played no small role in it. A unique breed of citizen journalists — at OffTheBus and elsewhere — opened up public access to information that conventional reporters attached to the Washington echo chamber cannot.
Yay!
If that toast turns you tipsy and you’re inclined to express yourself in print, make your way to this comment thread instead of submitting a piece (we want to celebrate, too! ;)).
Here’s to you!
OffTheBus — Amanda, Marc, John, Hanna, Neil, and Gabriel


]]> Dear OffTheBus members,

Back in July 2007 I showed up at HuffPost’s Manhattan office with a suitcase packed with enough clothes to get me through the month while I looked for an apartment and started OffTheBus. Even before our official launch many of you were peppering my inbox with emails, wanting to know what you could do to help. Among that initial circle of my newfound friends and acquaintances were Mayhill Fowler — who later rocked the campaigns and campaign journalism with what we now know as “Bittergate”; Beverly Davis — a veteran reporter who provided invaluable insight into the role that citizen journalists could play on the trail; Richard Riehl — the editor of the much loved Roadkill, that tasty, daily collection of candidate gaffes; and Ethan Hova — a Shakespearean actor from Los Angeles who co-wrote our first big story, “Romney Buys Conservatives.”

Sixteen months later and our network has grown by the thousands. The staff also grew, as I was joined by Marc Cooper, Neil Nagraj, John Tomasic, and Hanna Ingber Win and intern Gabriel Beltrone. Mayhill, Beverly, Richard, and Ethan have been joined by a remarkable cast of home-makers, retired journalists, aspiring journalists, lawyers and doctors, actors and actresses, some curmudgeons and, yes, a few professional journalists. New friends are now old friends, and old friends are friends forever.

Together we have been credited with creating the genre of citizen journalism (New York Magazine). You have broken some of the election cycle’s biggest scoops. You have also been described - by none other than the New York Times - as a “force in journalism.”

We — Marc, John, Hanna, Neil, Gabriel, Amanda — couldn’t be more proud of what we have all achieved together.

For just this once we are not going to ask you to write or report anything. Celebrate! Break out that champagne, beer, or wine (or for those young enough or so inclined, a coffee or chocolate cake) and make a toast! Or two. Or three.

Journalism isn’t and never has been a monolithic craft. The profession has a rich and varied history that often gets lost in defensive justifications of the status quo. In this election cycle journalism as we know it evolved tremendously, and you played no small role in it. A unique breed of citizen journalists — at OffTheBus and elsewhere — opened up public access to information that conventional reporters attached to the Washington echo chamber cannot.

Yay!

If that toast turns you tipsy and you’re inclined to express yourself in print, make your way to this comment thread instead of submitting a piece (we want to celebrate, too! ;)).

Here’s to you!

OffTheBus — Amanda, Marc, John, Hanna, Neil, and Gabriel


]]> Laid-off Kenosha, Wis., reporter seeks advice on starting non-profit online news community http://www.newassignment.net/blog/david_cohn/nov2008/02/laid_off_kenosha 2008-11-02T12:08:16-05:00 2008-11-02T12:08:16-05:00 David Cohn Denise Lockwood is like thousands of U.S. daily newspaper reporters — she fell victim to staff reductions. But she’s not giving up reporting — she’s pursuing her passion onlline.
Lockwood, an award-winning education and general-assignment reporter, is looking for advice on how to start a non-profit online news and community site for southeastern Wisconsin. She wants to focus on providing the context and background that dailies are being forced by economics to abandon.
One idea Lockwood is pursuing — what do we mean by “participatory democracy?” She worries that it isn’t enough to just vote anymore, that citizens “need to show up” at public meetings.
To learn more about her plans, listen to a 16-minute interview with Bill Densmore of the Media Giraffe Project and Matt Thompson, a 2008-2009 Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute fellow.


]]> Denise Lockwood is like thousands of U.S. daily newspaper reporters — she fell victim to staff reductions. But she’s not giving up reporting — she’s pursuing her passion onlline.

Lockwood, an award-winning education and general-assignment reporter, is looking for advice on how to start a non-profit online news and community site for southeastern Wisconsin. She wants to focus on providing the context and background that dailies are being forced by economics to abandon.

One idea Lockwood is pursuing — what do we mean by “participatory democracy?” She worries that it isn’t enough to just vote anymore, that citizens “need to show up” at public meetings.

To learn more about her plans, listen to a 16-minute interview with Bill Densmore of the Media Giraffe Project and Matt Thompson, a 2008-2009 Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute fellow.


]]> How should Newspapers use Twitter? http://www.newassignment.net/blog/tom_cheredar/oct2008/25/how_should_newsp 2008-10-25T03:54:24-04:00 2008-10-25T03:54:24-04:00 Tom Cheredar Rules, standard practices and policies are all null and void when confronted with communicating the news on a new medium. Such is the case with twitter, the web application that allows users to send 140-character messages from virtually any location with at least a cell phone signal.
News organizations usually try one method for using twitter and it then becomes the standard. While some blast the news just like an RSS feed, others are talking back to their followers/readers.
“I really like the ones on twitter that participate in discussion,” says Gerard Barberi a social researcher who is active in many online communities. “Right now, only Chicago papers seem to be doing that.”
Barberi suggested RedeyeChicago and Coloneltribune were among the better news organization affiliated users that knew how to leverage the benefit of discussion in between posting news. The New York Times, which adhered to the RSS feed-like method, was among the worst.
“NYTimes.com used to get on my nerves with their twitter account — 15-20 links dumped at 4 a.m. into the twitterverse,” he says.  “They finally stopped. It was pointless following them.
The Times has multiple account that each feature a section of content, so depending on how you use twitter and how many NYTimes accounts you followed, it could completely drown out the human updates.
“I’m more likely to be responsive to humans,” he added.
But because it’s impossible to define how a news organization should use a service like twitter, I posed the question to my own followers after Nashville’s largest circulated newspaper The Tennessean , started increasing the number of linked stories per day.
From the responses I received, I’ve determined people either prefer to follow only news organizations that participate in an active discussion, or they follow because they appreciate the news being blasted. The noticeable difference between these groups seems to be their familiarity/preference for RSS. The two services are virtually cousins of each other.
Younger users on twitter mostly felt overwhelmed by a huge influx of “dead” messages — messages with no intended desire of a response. But, I really don’t think the age or experience trait holds much weight in this preference. Instead, I’d say it dealt more with how much of your social circle  (friends/family/like-minded acquaintances) used twitter as an essential means of communication.
Again, I don’t think blasting news only through the twitter account is necessarily the wrong use. However, if you have the ability to talk back to your readers and you don’t, aren’t you passing up a great opportunity? 
In the Tennessean’s case, they decided to break the mold by replying to my question with another question: “So what would you like to talk about?”
What, indeed.
—
Below were some comments I found interesting:
gmarkham    @TChed I’ll follow a news org headline feed on Twitter. Rarely click through, though.
erincubert    @TChed I was following a ton via mobile … and then WSJ went nuts, so I had to turn them off … BBC too. I like sleep more than headlines.
sgurne    @TChed I only follow one, just to know what’s going on. any more would be information overload.   about 12 hours ago from web  in reply to TChed
ChristineTatum    @TChed Interesting question. Please let me know what people tell you. And yeah, I do follow news orgs even if they “blast“ only.


]]> Rules, standard practices and policies are all null and void when confronted with communicating the news on a new medium. Such is the case with twitter, the web application that allows users to send 140-character messages from virtually any location with at least a cell phone signal.

News organizations usually try one method for using twitter and it then becomes the standard. While some blast the news just like an RSS feed, others are talking back to their followers/readers.

“I really like the ones on twitter that participate in discussion,” says Gerard Barberi a social researcher who is active in many online communities. “Right now, only Chicago papers seem to be doing that.”

Barberi suggested RedeyeChicago and Coloneltribune were among the better news organization affiliated users that knew how to leverage the benefit of discussion in between posting news. The New York Times, which adhered to the RSS feed-like method, was among the worst.

“NYTimes.com used to get on my nerves with their twitter account — 15-20 links dumped at 4 a.m. into the twitterverse,” he says.  “They finally stopped. It was pointless following them.

The Times has multiple account that each feature a section of content, so depending on how you use twitter and how many NYTimes accounts you followed, it could completely drown out the human updates.

“I’m more likely to be responsive to humans,” he added.

But because it’s impossible to define how a news organization should use a service like twitter, I posed the question to my own followers after Nashville’s largest circulated newspaper The Tennessean , started increasing the number of linked stories per day.

From the responses I received, I’ve determined people either prefer to follow only news organizations that participate in an active discussion, or they follow because they appreciate the news being blasted. The noticeable difference between these groups seems to be their familiarity/preference for RSS. The two services are virtually cousins of each other.

Younger users on twitter mostly felt overwhelmed by a huge influx of “dead” messages — messages with no intended desire of a response. But, I really don’t think the age or experience trait holds much weight in this preference. Instead, I’d say it dealt more with how much of your social circle  (friends/family/like-minded acquaintances) used twitter as an essential means of communication.

Again, I don’t think blasting news only through the twitter account is necessarily the wrong use. However, if you have the ability to talk back to your readers and you don’t, aren’t you passing up a great opportunity? 

In the Tennessean’s case, they decided to break the mold by replying to my question with another question: “So what would you like to talk about?”

What, indeed.
—

Below were some comments I found interesting:

gmarkham    @TChed I’ll follow a news org headline feed on Twitter. Rarely click through, though.

erincubert    @TChed I was following a ton via mobile … and then WSJ went nuts, so I had to turn them off … BBC too. I like sleep more than headlines.

sgurne    @TChed I only follow one, just to know what’s going on. any more would be information overload.   about 12 hours ago from web  in reply to TChed

ChristineTatum    @TChed Interesting question. Please let me know what people tell you. And yeah, I do follow news orgs even if they “blast“ only.


]]> Citizen Media Leaders: The Journalist With a Business Edge http://www.newassignment.net/blog/david_cohn/oct2008/14/citizen_media_le 2008-10-14T13:48:29-04:00 2008-10-14T13:48:29-04:00 David Cohn In a four-part series, Digital Journal is profiling innovative journalists, editors and institutions that are redrawing the map of citizen media. Find out how these bold men and women are impacting their corner of the media landscape.
This interview is with Dan Gillmor from the Center for Citizen Media.


]]> In a four-part series, Digital Journal is profiling innovative journalists, editors and institutions that are redrawing the map of citizen media. Find out how these bold men and women are impacting their corner of the media landscape.

This interview is with Dan Gillmor from the Center for Citizen Media.


]]> Transforming Viewers Into Users - Twitter via Live Broadcast http://www.newassignment.net/blog/tom_cheredar/oct2008/01/transforming_vie 2008-10-01T12:30:44-04:00 2008-10-01T12:30:44-04:00 Tom Cheredar Christian Grantham of NashvilleIsTalking helped orchestrate a local milestone in television broadcast news when he convinced executive producers at WKRN in Nashville to use Twitter as a way to interact with viewers on air.
He just posted a blog about his experience, which is definitely worth checking out if you’ve ever been curious about integrating the mircroblogging service into your news gathering:

I’ve been using Twitter for a few months and have wondered whether there was enough critical mass use to introduce it as a tool for anchors and producers to interact with viewers in real time. Then I saw CNN jump head first into on-air use. At first, CNN anchors seem too reluctant to even mention the word “Twitter,” sorta laughing at how strange the word sounded. It only took a couple of weeks before the anchors were saying it confidently, perhaps after using it and seeing its immediate value.

Read the full reaction here.


]]> Christian Grantham of NashvilleIsTalking helped orchestrate a local milestone in television broadcast news when he convinced executive producers at WKRN in Nashville to use Twitter as a way to interact with viewers on air.

He just posted a blog about his experience, which is definitely worth checking out if you’ve ever been curious about integrating the mircroblogging service into your news gathering:

I’ve been using Twitter for a few months and have wondered whether there was enough critical mass use to introduce it as a tool for anchors and producers to interact with viewers in real time. Then I saw CNN jump head first into on-air use. At first, CNN anchors seem too reluctant to even mention the word “Twitter,” sorta laughing at how strange the word sounded. It only took a couple of weeks before the anchors were saying it confidently, perhaps after using it and seeing its immediate value.

Read the full reaction here.


]]> Rethink Digital Archiving - An Important Question http://www.newassignment.net/blog/tom_cheredar/sep2008/28/rethink_digital_ 2008-09-28T05:47:32-04:00 2008-09-28T05:47:32-04:00 Tom Cheredar Well before newspapers hit a decade of exclusive Web-only coverage, they may want to take a look at how they archive articles.
Rarely are instances of breaking news done as one official report. Instead there could be a first version that is a few paragraphs explaining the situation, perhaps a quote. Later in a second version this news “snippet” might be updated with whatever was available at the end of the daily news cycle. Then, the following day a more complete third version is published and — lets say there is an error so corrections need to be made. You’re now up to four versions of the report.
My guess is that some multi-version reports are archived separately and others are updated and archived without any acknowledgment of draft history. Logic would dictate that a final version (with corrections) should be the only one necessary to archive for the sake of clarity. On the other hand publishing everything could provide an absolute record of information as it happened. But are either actions really the best policy?
I highly doubt most publications on the web have given much thought their digital archiving policy.
While there aren’t many news organizations old enough to anticipate what the future will hold for past sins of sloppy archiving, an examination of Wikipedia may give us some clues. The user generated encyclopedia is hardly sloppy in its archiving, but issues of filtering out inadequate content are on the rise. Those that have discrepancies with Wikipedia’s policies are creating alternatives to fill in the gaps.
A good example of this is deletionpedia, a site comprised of 60,000 deleted entries from the English Wikipedia. The site’s rational for its actions states: “Who knows what might be lost to the world if we lose anything? And besides, storage is cheap!”
Ars Technica Senior Editor Nate Anderson wrote a great post in which he states:

“…such sites are part of a new, “never lose it“ approach to information collection. Certainly this has tremendous benefits, but in terms of sheer information overload, does it also have costs?”

It’s a question newspaper publishers should be asking their staffs now rather than later.


]]> Well before newspapers hit a decade of exclusive Web-only coverage, they may want to take a look at how they archive articles.

Rarely are instances of breaking news done as one official report. Instead there could be a first version that is a few paragraphs explaining the situation, perhaps a quote. Later in a second version this news “snippet” might be updated with whatever was available at the end of the daily news cycle. Then, the following day a more complete third version is published and — lets say there is an error so corrections need to be made. You’re now up to four versions of the report.

My guess is that some multi-version reports are archived separately and others are updated and archived without any acknowledgment of draft history. Logic would dictate that a final version (with corrections) should be the only one necessary to archive for the sake of clarity. On the other hand publishing everything could provide an absolute record of information as it happened. But are either actions really the best policy?

I highly doubt most publications on the web have given much thought their digital archiving policy.

While there aren’t many news organizations old enough to anticipate what the future will hold for past sins of sloppy archiving, an examination of Wikipedia may give us some clues. The user generated encyclopedia is hardly sloppy in its archiving, but issues of filtering out inadequate content are on the rise. Those that have discrepancies with Wikipedia’s policies are creating alternatives to fill in the gaps.

A good example of this is deletionpedia, a site comprised of 60,000 deleted entries from the English Wikipedia. The site’s rational for its actions states: “Who knows what might be lost to the world if we lose anything? And besides, storage is cheap!”

Ars Technica Senior Editor Nate Anderson wrote a great post in which he states:

“…such sites are part of a new, “never lose it“ approach to information collection. Certainly this has tremendous benefits, but in terms of sheer information overload, does it also have costs?”

It’s a question newspaper publishers should be asking their staffs now rather than later.


]]> King Kong & Future News Gathering - iamnews.com http://www.newassignment.net/blog/tom_cheredar/sep2008/19/king_kong_future 2008-09-19T07:14:11-04:00 2008-09-19T07:14:11-04:00 Tom Cheredar The future of news gathering will serve the same purpose as it does today, but changes to the way its gathered might be best interpreted by King Kong — at least that’s the rational of Nir Ofir, founder of iamnews.com, an open newsroom platform that aims to give both publishers and reporters easy to use tools for covering the news.

Iamnews, which won the People’s Choice Award at the TechCrunch 50 demo pit, uses a cartoon version of the giant ape to explain how the platform works.
“’Journalism,’ ‘newsroom,’ and ‘platform’ are big scary words. We wanted people to understand the functionality apart from our big manifesto,” said Nir responding to a question about the colorful illustrations in an e-mail. “Oh..and they are cute.”
Much like the unconventional artwork, the idea for iamnews was born from a fictional story Nir was writing and not a desire to fix newsrooms from the inside out, according to an open letter on the Web site.

I imagined a reality in which the average citizen could be part of an innovative news network… whose reporters are citizens from all over the world, who participate in the creation of news. They would be directly connected to iamnews editors who allocate news assignments… I soon began to realize that this was not the world of science fiction, but something which could be done with today’s technology.

While the site’s name may suggest something metaphorical, it’s actually very straightforward. Publishers post assignments, reporters are invited provide coverage back to the site using several different methods and existing services. That information is then edited and eventually published. [The illustrated version does a much better job.]

Despite a busy schedule, Nir responded to some questions about iamnews and why he believes a new platform for gathering news is necessary:
Could you tell me a little bit about your background?
Prior to iamnews, I co founded blogTV.com, a LIVE social broadcasting platform that enables anyone to create his own TV channel on the web and on the mobile. I am an active entrepreneur in the Israeli and global Social Media space, specializing in the design, development and marketing of products and services in the field of communities and user generated content.
What kind of formal journalism experience do you have?
I had took some journalism classes during my bachelors degree in communications and media.
Why will iamnews.com work better (meaning, gather better news) than traditional mainstream media?
I think iamnews is a great workflow management tool for crowd-sourced news since it is an open platform. I think that for it to work better, iamnews needs to create a trusted network of reporters that will increase the discoverability of news. I also believe that by letting the audience be a part of the news creation process, News outlets can create a relationship with their readers. Relationship is everything for a new media brand.
Same question, but financially, how will iamnews.com succeed where traditional media is failing? (Will publishers pay reporters through the site?)
Well, this a really early stage for us but, we are planing to help publishers to distribute their content and by that create revenue to all the contributors.
Can any organization start using iamnews.com to find reporters to produce content?
We are planing to launch this kind of a solution by the end of the year.

Why is it important to allow multiple methods of submitting news?
We believe that users do not need to change their digital communications habit for becoming reporters on iamnews. Instead of forcing them to use our tools, we are pulling their content and pushing it to the news assignment hubs.
What limits does the site have for reporting news on a local, smaller level?
We do not have any editorial policy for when news starts and when it is ends. iamnews is a tool in the hands of the publishers. We are learning new things about what publishers want to do with this tool every day and we will try to crate the best simple functionality that will fit their needs.
For more information on iamnews.com’s progress check out their blog.


]]> The future of news gathering will serve the same purpose as it does today, but changes to the way its gathered might be best interpreted by King Kong — at least that’s the rational of Nir Ofir, founder of iamnews.com, an open newsroom platform that aims to give both publishers and reporters easy to use tools for covering the news.

Iamnews, which won the People’s Choice Award at the TechCrunch 50 demo pit, uses a cartoon version of the giant ape to explain how the platform works.

“’Journalism,’ ‘newsroom,’ and ‘platform’ are big scary words. We wanted people to understand the functionality apart from our big manifesto,” said Nir responding to a question about the colorful illustrations in an e-mail. “Oh..and they are cute.”

Much like the unconventional artwork, the idea for iamnews was born from a fictional story Nir was writing and not a desire to fix newsrooms from the inside out, according to an open letter on the Web site.

I imagined a reality in which the average citizen could be part of an innovative news network… whose reporters are citizens from all over the world, who participate in the creation of news. They would be directly connected to iamnews editors who allocate news assignments… I soon began to realize that this was not the world of science fiction, but something which could be done with today’s technology.

While the site’s name may suggest something metaphorical, it’s actually very straightforward. Publishers post assignments, reporters are invited provide coverage back to the site using several different methods and existing services. That information is then edited and eventually published. [The illustrated version does a much better job.]

Despite a busy schedule, Nir responded to some questions about iamnews and why he believes a new platform for gathering news is necessary:

Could you tell me a little bit about your background?
Prior to iamnews, I co founded blogTV.com, a LIVE social broadcasting platform that enables anyone to create his own TV channel on the web and on the mobile. I am an active entrepreneur in the Israeli and global Social Media space, specializing in the design, development and marketing of products and services in the field of communities and user generated content.

What kind of formal journalism experience do you have?
I had took some journalism classes during my bachelors degree in communications and media.

Why will iamnews.com work better (meaning, gather better news) than traditional mainstream media?
I think iamnews is a great workflow management tool for crowd-sourced news since it is an open platform. I think that for it to work better, iamnews needs to create a trusted network of reporters that will increase the discoverability of news. I also believe that by letting the audience be a part of the news creation process, News outlets can create a relationship with their readers. Relationship is everything for a new media brand.

Same question, but financially, how will iamnews.com succeed where traditional media is failing? (Will publishers pay reporters through the site?)
Well, this a really early stage for us but, we are planing to help publishers to distribute their content and by that create revenue to all the contributors.

Can any organization start using iamnews.com to find reporters to produce content?
We are planing to launch this kind of a solution by the end of the year.

Why is it important to allow multiple methods of submitting news?
We believe that users do not need to change their digital communications habit for becoming reporters on iamnews. Instead of forcing them to use our tools, we are pulling their content and pushing it to the news assignment hubs.

What limits does the site have for reporting news on a local, smaller level?
We do not have any editorial policy for when news starts and when it is ends. iamnews is a tool in the hands of the publishers. We are learning new things about what publishers want to do with this tool every day and we will try to crate the best simple functionality that will fit their needs.

For more information on iamnews.com’s progress check out their blog.


]]>